Sound&Silence
Hi! since BUILD 3760 VDJ is reanalyzing all my songs I load on a deck or into the automix playlist, even if they have been analyzed before. So severla BPM values are changing.
Any idea why this is happening?
Any idea why this is happening?
发表时间 Fri 02 Jun 17 @ 6:31 am
Adion
The bpm analyzer has been updated, so any songs that have not been scanned with the new analyzer will be scanned again
If there are any bpm's that were correct before, but are wrong now, please let us know the titles so we can investigate more.
If there are any bpm's that were correct before, but are wrong now, please let us know the titles so we can investigate more.
发表时间 Fri 02 Jun 17 @ 6:48 am
music234
Is it possible to build a filter-folder for files to scan with the new BPM-analyser?
发表时间 Sat 03 Jun 17 @ 7:02 am
PhantomDeejay
You don't need a filter folder.
Just drag the files on "Automix" and all tracks that are not scanned with the new scan engine will start scanning automatically
Just drag the files on "Automix" and all tracks that are not scanned with the new scan engine will start scanning automatically
发表时间 Sat 03 Jun 17 @ 6:28 pm
music234
Thank you for the hint ;o)
发表时间 Sun 04 Jun 17 @ 1:00 am
Mobile Zombie
If rescanning songs , could this change the timing of cue points or other POI 's ?
发表时间 Sun 04 Jun 17 @ 1:58 pm
Adion
In 3761, it could move automix points that have not been manually moved earlier, and adjust bpm/phase if it had not been manually changed.
Other POI's, automix points that have been manually adjusted or bpm/phase that had been manually adjusted will not be affected by the automatic rescanning.
Other POI's, automix points that have been manually adjusted or bpm/phase that had been manually adjusted will not be affected by the automatic rescanning.
发表时间 Sun 04 Jun 17 @ 2:01 pm
lincol2
Adion wrote :
In 3761, ... or bpm/phase that had been manually adjusted will not be affected by the automatic rescanning.
Reassuring.
发表时间 Mon 05 Jun 17 @ 3:15 pm
fallguy66
Adion wrote :
In 3761, it could move automix points that have not been manually moved earlier, and adjust bpm/phase if it had not been manually changed.
Other POI's, automix points that have been manually adjusted or bpm/phase that had been manually adjusted will not be affected by the automatic rescanning.
Other POI's, automix points that have been manually adjusted or bpm/phase that had been manually adjusted will not be affected by the automatic rescanning.
I was using Automix fade intro/outro 0 sec and it still changed my manually set POI's.
发表时间 Tue 06 Jun 17 @ 3:26 pm
RCBAudio
I let the computer run all night re-scanning my entire library and it is still scanning when I move a song to the automix
发表时间 Wed 07 Jun 17 @ 11:08 pm
fallguy66
I am using Automix to rescan my songs and adjusting the cue points after it scans. If I use a song already scanned in Automix it will not rescan it...
发表时间 Thu 08 Jun 17 @ 12:22 am
lincol2
ohshit wrote :
Reassuring.
Adion wrote :
In 3761, ... or bpm/phase that had been manually adjusted will not be affected by the automatic rescanning.
Reassuring.
B3780 is a disaster for me, numerous files that I have manually affix BPM to has now been changed after this update. After prior assurance that they will NOT!
BTW these changed files are NOT reanalyzed, just update b3780 , reopen VDJ and I see BPM changes I never wanted.
BTW experimentalBeatAnalyser is set to NO
What now, go back to previous update?
Will this save my prior BPM setting? This is what I want.
发表时间 Sun 02 Jul 17 @ 6:41 pm
bigcity1200
Yes, build 3760 was just implemented and thought this was an issue. When moving a file to Deck 1 or Deck which is set to Auto Cue at 0db, the software does not re-analyze. This only happens when moving to Auto Cue? Why is that? Should it re-analyze on both the decks and Auto-Cue?
发表时间 Mon 03 Jul 17 @ 2:35 am
bigcity1200
Update - It is analyzing for Deck 1, Deck 2, Sidelist, and Automix. So, this is a new BPM, etc analyzer?
发表时间 Mon 03 Jul 17 @ 4:26 am
Adion
ohshit wrote :
B3780 is a disaster for me, numerous files that I have manually affix BPM to has now been changed after this update. After prior assurance that they will NOT!
BTW these changed files are NOT reanalyzed, just update b3780 , reopen VDJ and I see BPM changes I never wanted.
BTW experimentalBeatAnalyser is set to NO
What now, go back to previous update?
Will this save my prior BPM setting? This is what I want.
ohshit wrote :
Reassuring.
Adion wrote :
In 3761, ... or bpm/phase that had been manually adjusted will not be affected by the automatic rescanning.
Reassuring.
B3780 is a disaster for me, numerous files that I have manually affix BPM to has now been changed after this update. After prior assurance that they will NOT!
BTW these changed files are NOT reanalyzed, just update b3780 , reopen VDJ and I see BPM changes I never wanted.
BTW experimentalBeatAnalyser is set to NO
What now, go back to previous update?
Will this save my prior BPM setting? This is what I want.
How do you manually edit your bpm usually?
We were not able to find any way that would overwrite them with the automatic scan.
发表时间 Mon 03 Jul 17 @ 4:33 am
groovindj
music234 wrote :
Is it possible to build a filter-folder for files to scan with the new BPM-analyser?
PhantomDeejay wrote :
Just drag the files on "Automix"
I think it would be much better to have a filter folder. That way we can actually see which files (and how many) need re-analyzing.
With your workaround method, we have to drag every file in our collection to Automix, because we can't tell which ones need processing*.
* if you hold the mouse over the 'audio' icon to the left of each file in the browser, it does say 'not' analyzed' - but I'm not prepared to do that for every single one of my files. There needs to be an easier way.
发表时间 Wed 30 Aug 17 @ 11:13 am
Adion
You make it sound like you have to drag every individual file, but you could just press * in the search field, use CTRL+A and drag all files at once.
Also, why do you need to know in the first place? It will happen automatically when needed anyway, and in the browser it probably won't give you much advantage.
Also, why do you need to know in the first place? It will happen automatically when needed anyway, and in the browser it probably won't give you much advantage.
发表时间 Wed 30 Aug 17 @ 5:11 pm
groovindj
It's just that (to me), putting all the files into Automix seems a strange way of going about it.
Why don't these files show under isscanned=0 if they need rescanning? That would make sense, but the 'not analyzed' message in the tooltip is the only indication that the files need scanning again.
I know it's not a big issue, and that eventually they will all get rescanned, but putting them in Automix? Spock would say that it's illogical. :-)
Why don't these files show under isscanned=0 if they need rescanning? That would make sense, but the 'not analyzed' message in the tooltip is the only indication that the files need scanning again.
I know it's not a big issue, and that eventually they will all get rescanned, but putting them in Automix? Spock would say that it's illogical. :-)
发表时间 Wed 30 Aug 17 @ 5:24 pm
kradcliffe
Also, a pop up message should have appeared letting users know that files needed rescanned because of the changes.
There have been literally hundreds of posts about this on various groups and a major change like this should have been highlighted to users a bit more.
There have been literally hundreds of posts about this on various groups and a major change like this should have been highlighted to users a bit more.
发表时间 Wed 30 Aug 17 @ 5:28 pm
lincol2
kradcliffe wrote :
Also, a pop up message should have appeared letting users know that files needed rescanned because of the changes..
..and the option to ask "Do you want it rescanned"?
发表时间 Wed 30 Aug 17 @ 9:31 pm