I've found what might be a bug, it might not
This (below) on a POI (cue 1 ) moves itself forward 1 beat (so far so good)
get_beatpos & param_add 1 & param_cast & set_cue 1
This (below) one also moves itself forward 1 beat (this isn't right is it?)
get_beatpos & param_add 0.5 & param_cast & set_cue 1
This one also moves itself forward 0.5 beat (A pattern emerges)
get_beatpos & param_add 0.25 & param_cast & set_cue 1
*Could a mod correct my title typo please*
This (below) on a POI (cue 1 ) moves itself forward 1 beat (so far so good)
get_beatpos & param_add 1 & param_cast & set_cue 1
This (below) one also moves itself forward 1 beat (this isn't right is it?)
get_beatpos & param_add 0.5 & param_cast & set_cue 1
This one also moves itself forward 0.5 beat (A pattern emerges)
get_beatpos & param_add 0.25 & param_cast & set_cue 1
*Could a mod correct my title typo please*
发表时间 Sat 31 Jan 15 @ 5:42 pm
is it possible if you have snap to beat on in POI editor it messes with this just a idea
lol u are the expert not me :-)
lol u are the expert not me :-)
发表时间 Sat 31 Jan 15 @ 6:05 pm
Nope Snap isn't on. (hotcue nor POI editor) (actually tested snap 1/0 makes no difference)
I saw this a good while ago (working at 100th of a beat resolutions) and I just accepted it without thinking but I figure it needs clearing up, Is it a bug or am I misinterpreting.
I saw this a good while ago (working at 100th of a beat resolutions) and I just accepted it without thinking but I figure it needs clearing up, Is it a bug or am I misinterpreting.
发表时间 Sat 31 Jan 15 @ 6:13 pm
It was indeed a bug, will be fixed next build
发表时间 Sat 31 Jan 15 @ 11:29 pm
Thanks for the confirm,
So it was a bug, Wow that means VDJ is actually 2* faster at reading and rewriting POI. By my reckoning it works ok rewriting POI 2.608 ms ahead (100th of a beat @ 230 bpm)
So it was a bug, Wow that means VDJ is actually 2* faster at reading and rewriting POI. By my reckoning it works ok rewriting POI 2.608 ms ahead (100th of a beat @ 230 bpm)
发表时间 Sun 01 Feb 15 @ 9:36 am