Joop3m
What i like to see is the possibility to store loops in the sample section which can handle more than 4 beats....
So i can program acapella's for instance with beatlock
So i can program acapella's for instance with beatlock
发表时间 Sun 03 May 09 @ 8:48 am
SBDJ
Loops aren't limited to 4 beats - if you have a track currently looped when you record the sample it uses that loop length.
发表时间 Sun 03 May 09 @ 5:28 pm
Joop3m
@sbdj.... So why have i always thought the freakin loops were 4 beats? could made a lot of money knowing this haha....
tnx!
Joop
(ps... how's the sms-text going?)
tnx!
Joop
(ps... how's the sms-text going?)
发表时间 Mon 04 May 09 @ 6:24 am
cstoll
Joop3m wrote :
@sbdj.... So why have i always thought the freakin loops were 4 beats? could made a lot of money knowing this haha...
Because no body reads the manual ...
pg 44 ...
"To record a circular (looping) sample, use the deck’s loop control to set the loop then click the “Loop” button on the bottom of the sample cell. The loop is automatically recorded to that sample cell and ready for immediate use.
If the “Loop” button is clicked without defining a loop using the deck controls, a 4 beat loop is automatically recorded."
发表时间 Mon 04 May 09 @ 12:00 pm
av1613
In built EQ/Kills on the sampler section would be very useful..or can I do that already? I ponder.....play from deck with EQ already adjusted with VDJ internal mixer and get a recorded EQ' version of that sample? hmmmm...will have to try that! :-)
发表时间 Sun 10 May 09 @ 2:35 pm
av1613
Rubbish!...yer EQ on sampler please.
发表时间 Sun 10 May 09 @ 2:37 pm
SBDJ
Use a triple output sound card and run the sampler to it's own channel on a mixer. Far more flexibility :)
发表时间 Sun 10 May 09 @ 5:42 pm
av1613
SBDJ wrote :
Use a triple output sound card and run the sampler to it's own channel on a mixer. Far more flexibility :)
Doing that with Timecode but I often use 2 or more sample to spice up dull transitions. Effects are cool but making good use of the auto matched samples is a good way to hype a crowed....+ it makes me sound like a god!! haha I was accused of just playing a DMC mix's saturday night cos mixing / remixing like that cant be done live...a great compliment I thought!! Ok..it was rehearsed..but still. :-)
Anywho, with EQ's on each sample output I feel I could push it further before its sound messy.
发表时间 Mon 11 May 09 @ 3:36 am
Joop3m
ok then.... let me put one more in:
IS it necessary to take a sample at each bpm (and save it) to use the sample in its original pitch, because the pitch is shifting along with the bpm change....
or am i overlooking some page again?
gr,
Joop
IS it necessary to take a sample at each bpm (and save it) to use the sample in its original pitch, because the pitch is shifting along with the bpm change....
or am i overlooking some page again?
gr,
Joop
发表时间 Mon 11 May 09 @ 8:28 am
SBDJ
av1613 wrote :
Doing that with Timecode but I often use 2 or more sample to spice up dull transitions. Effects are cool but making good use of the auto matched samples is a good way to hype a crowed....+ it makes me sound like a god!! haha I was accused of just playing a DMC mix's saturday night cos mixing / remixing like that cant be done live...a great compliment I thought!! Ok..it was rehearsed..but still. :-)
Anywho, with EQ's on each sample output I feel I could push it further before its sound messy.
Anywho, with EQ's on each sample output I feel I could push it further before its sound messy.
Yup, but controlling multiple EQs on multiple samples would become messy. The best solution would probably be to have dual sampler outputs, so you could do a 4ch output to two seperate channels on a mixer for decks, and 2 for sampler.
Or more decks.
This is where software like Ableton and Mixmeister come into their own.
发表时间 Mon 11 May 09 @ 10:04 am
SBDJ
Joop3m wrote :
ok then.... let me put one more in:
IS it necessary to take a sample at each bpm (and save it) to use the sample in its original pitch, because the pitch is shifting along with the bpm change....
or am i overlooking some page again?
gr,
Joop
IS it necessary to take a sample at each bpm (and save it) to use the sample in its original pitch, because the pitch is shifting along with the bpm change....
or am i overlooking some page again?
gr,
Joop
You are correct, sampler output is pitch shifted rather than time stretched.
发表时间 Mon 11 May 09 @ 10:05 am
djsherz
Yeah, that would probably be asking a bit much of most people's computers to have 12 independently-running timestretch engines for the sampler!
发表时间 Sun 31 May 09 @ 8:23 am