locoDog
It's the name for the repeat_start script, it can be any string you want [like variables can]
repeat_start_instant 'rsiKeySmooth' 50ms 10 & ["name", repeat every Xms, repeat 10 times, & script to repeat]
the fastest they can run is 30ms but it will swing a few ms either way.
repeat_start_instant 'rsiKeySmooth' 50ms 10 & ["name", repeat every Xms, repeat 10 times, & script to repeat]
the fastest they can run is 30ms but it will swing a few ms either way.
发表时间 Sun 04 Aug 19 @ 8:34 am
locoDog
If you want to cut your teeth with scripting, read this thread
https://virtualdj.com/forums/223743/General_Discussion/Script_School.html?page=1
I do ramble on a bit but I made a fair attempt at how scripts work [stuff like queries, doing maths, using variables to set dials, what have you]
Back to your original post; imagine having a computer in front of you and the software can't do maths...
https://virtualdj.com/forums/223743/General_Discussion/Script_School.html?page=1
I do ramble on a bit but I made a fair attempt at how scripts work [stuff like queries, doing maths, using variables to set dials, what have you]
Back to your original post; imagine having a computer in front of you and the software can't do maths...
发表时间 Sun 04 Aug 19 @ 8:55 am
gbdj99
EDIT: IGNORE
Thanks again!
Thanks again!
发表时间 Sun 04 Aug 19 @ 3:40 pm
gbdj99
Also delays of down to 10ms have been working for me here - just seen that you mentioned that.
发表时间 Sun 04 Aug 19 @ 3:41 pm
gbdj99
Also are you sure key_smooth linearly maps -1 to -6 key and 1 to +6 key. Using key_smooth +0.5 from the default key jumps straight up to +6 - this can't be right.
发表时间 Sun 04 Aug 19 @ 3:51 pm
gbdj99
Turns out the range is actually from -12 to +12 according to the docs. https://www.virtualdj.com/wiki/VDJscript_verbs_v8.html
But it caps at +6 and -6 anyway because having it work as described in documentation would be very silly.
But it caps at +6 and -6 anyway because having it work as described in documentation would be very silly.
发表时间 Sun 04 Aug 19 @ 3:54 pm
locoDog
it looks like I was mistaken, 0.0 to 1.0 translates to -6 to +6
but any time value lower than 30ms is read as 30ms, It's been a while since I proved that but I can't see it having been changed
but any time value lower than 30ms is read as 30ms, It's been a while since I proved that but I can't see it having been changed
发表时间 Sun 04 Aug 19 @ 4:00 pm