快速登录:  

Forum: General Discussion

话题: Sound Blaster Or ASUS Onboard

由于该帖子已年深日久,可能包含陈旧过时或描述错误的信息。

Should I use the

ASUS onboard Audio
http://www.asus.com/products4.aspx?modelmenu=2&model=1178&l1=3&l2=11&l3=307

ADI® 8-channel High Definition Audio CODEC
- Support Jack-Sensing, Enumeration, Multi-streaming and Jack-Retasking
- Coaxial / Optical S/PDIF out ports at back I/O
- ASUS Noise Filter

OR

USB Sound Blaster Live! 24-bit External
http://www.soundblaster.com/products/product.asp?category=1&subcategory=206&product=10702&nav=2

24-bit Digital-to-Analog conversion during playback in 16 or 24 bit with sampling rates of up to 48kHz in 5.1 mode and up to 96kHz in stereo mode. 24-bit Analog-to-Digital conversion during recording in 16 or 24 bit with sampling rates up to 96kHz SPDIF (Sony/Philips Digital Interface) out with up to 24-bit at 96 kHz quality. Supports Windows XP SP2.

 

发表时间 Fri 27 Apr 07 @ 1:41 am
I use the ASUS sound on my MOBO - sound is comparable to the soundblaster.
 

发表时间 Fri 27 Apr 07 @ 1:44 am
When you say,

“sound is comparable to the SoundBlaster”

The same as, a little better, almost as good..?????

thanks
 

发表时间 Fri 27 Apr 07 @ 2:20 am
same to moderatly better.
 

发表时间 Fri 27 Apr 07 @ 11:00 am
DJ-ALFPRO InfinityModeratorMember since 2005
I think Sound Blaster has better dynamics than any integrated sound chip except for Sound Storm by Nvidia.
 

发表时间 Sat 28 Apr 07 @ 3:56 am
Actually when It comes to Onboard sound in the last year or so with vista and Analogue systems Sound Max codec VS soundblaster, You could debate for hours which is better.

Truth be told Neither is what I would call "high end".

But in terms of sounding "nice" and "good". Both are about the same. Both work for 6.1 sound etc.

I use intergrated sound because It's just easier. - no extra bits of hardware to worry about.

Kinda like which pick-up is better;
Ford, Dodge, or Chevy, or Toyota.

Take your pick, all about the same anyway.
 

发表时间 Sat 28 Apr 07 @ 1:20 pm


(陈旧帖子或论坛版块会自动关闭)